1069 - 1697

It is hard to be at fault if you are a pursuer

Even if you are negotiating a highway the wrong way, in the dark, dressed in black, having spent the afternoon in the pub

Christopher McNab v Bluebird Buses Limited - Court of Session, 20 February 2007

Christopher McNab was knocked down in an RTA on 8 March 2003. Damages were agreed at £11,000 with interest. The pursuer had spent an afternoon drinking in the pub and had missed his bus home. He decided to take the main A92 road by foot in the dark without a torch. He was struck from behind by a bus. It was pitch dark. The pursuer was to the right of the white line demarcating the edge of the carriageway. He was walking with his back to oncoming traffic. He was wearing dark clothing.

The first question for the court to determine was whether it had been proved that the defender's driver fell below the standard of reasonable care. The bus driver had not seen the pursuer. The court attached no importance at all to the fact that the pursuer had been drinking and indeed Lord Brodie stated "If the pursuer's consumption of alcohol made him more foolhardy than he otherwise would have been, it is his foolhardy behaviour that I must consider, not its explanation."

He found the bus driver to be at fault and assessed contributory negligence at 50%.

Subscribe to our news feeds

Keep up-to-date with all of our publications, legal updates, firm news and events.

Firm NewsLegal UpdatesSMIBEvents