1069 - 1747

...Marc MacDonald v Christopher Mallan

Court of Session, Outer House 4 January 2008

In January of this year Lord Emslie again refused a jury trial in the case of Marc MacDonald v Christopher Mallan. This was a claim for damages following a road accident. The defenders again opposed the motion on the basis that uncertainties surrounding the future wage loss claim made it too complex for a jury.

In this case the pursuers and defenders had competing and conflicting written cases in relation to what the pursuer's job prospects would have been had it not been for the accident and in particular the extent to which he would have been promoted, what his job security would have been, what his employment prospects were now on either a full or a part time basis and the extent to which, if any, his retirement age had been affected by the injuries sustained in the accident.

The defenders also made reference to the pursuer's statement of valuation and suggested that with reference to the Ogden Tables some of the future wage loss calculations had been done wrongly and some others, because of the various possible outcomes, had not even been attempted.

It was suggested by the defenders that if those advising the pursuer who had time at their disposal and the benefit of the guidance notes were not able to carry out all the calculations what chance would a jury have of reaching a proper result when they had neither the professional experience, nor the luxury of time nor a chance to study all the relevant materials.

Lord Emslie on considering matters again accepted the complexities here were such as to make the case unsuitable for a jury trial. Although he confirmed that each case has to be considered on its own merits he went on to say "some parallels can be drawn between the present case and my recent refusal of issues in the case of Slessor and O'Neill. The most striking of these parallels is, of course, the significant continuing uncertainty, which on an assessment of the pleadings and other available documents, affects particular elements of the claim for future loss".

Subscribe to our news feeds

Keep up-to-date with all of our publications, legal updates, firm news and events.

Firm NewsLegal UpdatesSMIBEvents