1069 - 1659

A knock out defence

Robert Lee Uren v Corporate Leisure (UK) Limited, The Ministry of Defence and Others - [2010] EWHC 46 (QB)

Mr Uren, an RAF employee, brought an action for damages arising out of an accident that occurred during a health and fun day held at RAF High Wycombe in July 2005. The event, organised by the RAF, included games and races in the open air. The 'pool game' was in the nature of a relay race. Team members would run up to an inflatable rectangular pool, climb in over the side and retrieve a piece of plastic fruit floating in the water. They would then carry it out of the pool and deposit it in a bucket, at which point the next team member repeated the routine.

The pool was owned by Corporate Leisure (CL), a company that specialised in managing and providing equipment for corporate entertainment events of the type popularised in the television series 'It's a Knockout'. Mr Uren had observed the first heat, whereby half the contestants had entered the pool by sliding over the side head first, with their arms outstretched in front of them. The rest had vaulted or scrambled over the side, landing in the pool feet first. On Mr Uren's turn, he ran up to the side of the pool, and launched himself over in a continuous movement head first with his arms outstretched in front of him. He hit his head on the bottom of the pool and broke his neck. He was rendered tetraplegic.

Mr Uren claimed that CL and his employer, the Ministry of Defence (MOD), were each in breach of a duty to take reasonable care to ensure that he was safe in participating in the game. He argued that it was reasonably foreseeable that contestants would enter the pool head first, that serious injury could result and therefore head first entry should have been prohibited from the outset. Alternatively, on the game commencing and it becoming apparent that contestants were entering head first, a ban ought to have been imposed.

The defendants argued that the game was reasonably safe. The judge accepted their expert evidence that the risk of serious injury was very small:

"The contestants were told to take care on entering the pool. It was obvious that they should not attempt to dive in without sliding over the side. In sliding over the side they would be moving essentially horizontally and the friction would slow the pace of entry. At that point the contestants would be about a metre above the ground and by entering with arms outstretched to the front, they could be expected to be able to control the impact with the bottom of the pool - a lining resting on a grassed playing field."

He did not consider the defendants to be in breach of their common law duty of care owed to Mr Uren. He commented

"Enjoyable competitive activities are an important and beneficial part of the life of very many people who are fit enough to participate in them. This is especially true in the case of service personnel… This means that a balance has to be struck between the level of risk involved and the benefit the activity confers on the participants and thereby on society generally. The pool game was an enjoyable game, in part because of the physical challenges it posed contestants. The risk of serious injury was small. In my judgment, neither CL nor the MOD was obliged to neuter the game of much of its enjoyable challenge by prohibiting head first entry."

The decision was reached despite the judge's criticism of the MOD's risk assessment. He stated that the issue was not whether adequate risk assessments had been undertaken, but whether the defendants took reasonable measures to ensure the game was safe, which in his opinion they had.

This is another useful commonsense decision in cases where accidents occur in the course of sporting activities. The court recognised the need to maintain a balance between the risks involved in sporting activities and the public interest in allowing sport to be enjoyable. Providers and employers will, however, still require to ensure that the level of risk involved in any such activity is acceptable - and commensurate with the level of fun.

Contributed by Daniela Fusi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subscribe to our news feeds

Keep up-to-date with all of our publications, legal updates, firm news and events.

Firm NewsLegal UpdatesSMIBEvents